Experimental and CFD Modeling of Hydraulic Jumps Forming at Submerged Weir
By: Al-Hashimi, S. A. M
.
Contributor(s): Saeed, K. A.
Publisher: New York Springer 2019Edition: Vol.100(3), Sep.Description: 487-494p.Subject(s): Civil EngineeringOnline resources: Click here Summary: Broad-crested weirs are defined as structures where the streamlines are parallel to each other and the pressure is hydrostatic over the horizontal crest. The water surface profile for submerged flow over weir was estimated through flume experimentation and compared with numerical model results. The numerical model was developed using ANSYS FLUENT version 15 in three dimensions (3D) with a standard k–ε turbulent model. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method was used to estimate the water level in each cell and includes tail water influence acting on a broad-crested weir. The agreement between the FLUENT model and the experimental results for water depth was good. Such conditions are often difficult to predict, particularly at onset of the hydraulic jump. The numerically derived pressure and velocity distributions over the weir are simulated in 3D. Good agreement was achieved between numerical and experimental discharge with a relative error of 6.6%. The relative error between the numerical and experimental coefficient of discharge was 7.7%.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles Abstract Database
|
School of Engineering & Technology Archieval Section | Not for loan | 2020424 |
Broad-crested weirs are defined as structures where the streamlines are parallel to each other and the pressure is hydrostatic over the horizontal crest. The water surface profile for submerged flow over weir was estimated through flume experimentation and compared with numerical model results. The numerical model was developed using ANSYS FLUENT version 15 in three dimensions (3D) with a standard k–ε turbulent model. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method was used to estimate the water level in each cell and includes tail water influence acting on a broad-crested weir. The agreement between the FLUENT model and the experimental results for water depth was good. Such conditions are often difficult to predict, particularly at onset of the hydraulic jump. The numerically derived pressure and velocity distributions over the weir are simulated in 3D. Good agreement was achieved between numerical and experimental discharge with a relative error of 6.6%. The relative error between the numerical and experimental coefficient of discharge was 7.7%.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.